Because his blood alcohol content exceeded. 1984, Officer Henning forwarded a verified report of appellant's arrest and the results of appellant's breath analysis test to the Department of Revenue. That test revealed a blood alcohol content of. Officer Henning transported appellant to the Columbia Police Department where Officer Bobby Deeter administered a breath analysis test. Based on appellant's poor performance on these tests, as well as his admissions that he was driving the vehicle and had been drinking earlier that evening, Officer Henning placed appellant under arrest for driving while intoxicated. After speaking with appellant and observing his actions, Officer Henning suspected that appellant was intoxicated and asked him to perform three field sobriety tests. Upon arrival, Officer Henning found the appellant sitting in the driver's seat of one of the vehicles involved in the accident. On February 11, 1984, Officer Brian Henning of the Columbia, Missouri Police Department was called to the scene of an accident in Columbia, Missouri. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Because of the constitutional challenge, we have jurisdiction. Appellant further contends that the provisions of § 302.510 requiring municipal police officers to file certain reports with the Director of Revenue violate Mo.Const.art. On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the state's evidence at trial. Miller, appeals a judgment of the Circuit Court suspending his driving privilege pursuant to the Administrative Suspension and Revocation Act (hereafter, the "Act") §§ 302.500 to 302.540, RSMo Cum.Supp. of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.Īppellant, Danieal H.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |